<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN: DOCX: slow opening"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135245#c7">Comment # 7</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - FILEOPEN: DOCX: slow opening"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135245">bug 135245</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:jluth@mail.com" title="Justin L <jluth@mail.com>"> <span class="fn">Justin L</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Well, in these test documents, there truly are a TON of nested frames for the
page numbers - as seen in the ODT's styles.xml.
So almost certainly the first commit from author Zolnai Tamás on 2014-02-16
17:35:14 with commit 05955dd2096c29853f831d5d16b86c7b7ca00b28
DOCX export: nested text frames
In Word it is not allowed to anchor a shape to another shape.
That's why this code write text boxes only on the first level,
nested frames is also written out on the same level because
writeDMLText/WriteVMLText will push nested frames
into m_aFramesOfParagraph's back.
is the reason for the "multiplication" of frames seen in the header.
So I'm not sure any of this could be considered a bug (except for the design of
the original document).
(In reply to Gabor Kelemen from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=135245#c5">comment #5</a>)
<span class="quote">> Loading many drawing shapes is slow.</span >
Well yes - this known problem can be considered a problem, and these example
documents are good proof of that. I imagine there is a bug report about that
already.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>