<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - picture (wmf) not printed nor exported" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138515#c11">Comment # 11</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - picture (wmf) not printed nor exported" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138515">bug 138515</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:xiscofauli@libreoffice.org" title="Xisco Faulí <xiscofauli@libreoffice.org>"> Xisco Faulí</a> <pre>(In reply to Xisco Faulí from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=138515#c10">comment #10</a>) > (In reply to Miklos Vajna from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=138515#c4">comment #4</a>) > > Disabling lazy-loading was just a workaround, so if the original problem is > > not-reintroduced by the revert, then it sounds like a good direction. > > I will revert it in master. Meanwhile, I'll build libreoffice-7-0 and > libreoffice-7-1 without the commit in place to see whether it's safe to > backport the revert I build libreoffice-7-0 < a4bdd833a252ed4d942e4478fc820f9f2ee725fe > with the revert on top and <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_VERIFIED bz_closed" title="VERIFIED FIXED - FILEOPEN DOCX Two pages document containing WMF images appears as one page" href="show_bug.cgi?id=126310">bug 126310</a> is not reintroduced, so it would be safe to backport the revert to previous versions in case we would need to</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>