<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Can't edit file on samba shares ( see comment 28 )" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115747#c43">Comment # 43</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Can't edit file on samba shares ( see comment 28 )" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115747">bug 115747</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:m1027@posteo.net" title="m1027 <m1027@posteo.net>"> m1027</a> <pre>(In reply to Thorsten Behrens (allotropia) from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=115747#c35">comment #35</a>) > the question is, does setting UseDocumentOOoLockFile > to false constitute a valid workaround? -> NEEDINFO for the moment In my case yes. I'd just like to share that the root case of that issue is still obscure. We have a dozen linux clients and a dozen windows clients using libreoffice 6.4 to 7.0 on two different samba 4.12 servers: - Windows libreoffice users were never hit - Not all linux users hit; it seems that mostly vfs mounts (like with gnome) never reveal the issue; while fstab/manual mounting users are hit more often - The issue just "appeared" about 6 months ago, roughly when switching from samba 4.11 to 4.12 on one of the servers with a recent and faster hardware. - On one of the samba server's I personally can reproduce the issue but not on the other; with the exact same libreoffice linux client and the exact same smbd.conf for both servers... (server's kernels and HW differ though). If someone want me to do some more tests, expecially with the two samba servers being hit/not hit, let me know. Thanks</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>