<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579#c46">Comment # 46</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - It's unclear, how "Continue previous numbering" should work" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140579">bug 140579</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>(In reply to sdc.blanco from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=140579#c45">comment #45</a>) > Probably my simple test document is too simple to be able to see the > significance of *start* of active chunk over "cursor position". No, and actually your test 4 is the example that you ask for: > Can you give a concrete example to illustrate that? You select a chunk from para 1 to list entry 2, and your (last, and at the same time the only) chunk ends at list entry 2 (where the cursor blinks), but it starts at para 1, so Writer considers para 1 when looks for a *previous* list. Para 1 does not have preceding paragraphs with lists, so Writer disallows adding to list, despite the selection contains the list entry 2, and and even the blinking cursor is at list entry 2. That is how it's different from test 2, where the last chunk starts at list entry 2.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>