<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Table of Contents Doesn't Put in Blank Numbered Items Generated via Chapter Numbering" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141925#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Table of Contents Doesn't Put in Blank Numbered Items Generated via Chapter Numbering" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141925">bug 141925</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:jluth@mail.com" title="Justin L <jluth@mail.com>"> Justin L</a> <pre>Created <a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=171554" name="attach_171554" title="141925_emptyParaTocEntriesB.odt: a counter-example">attachment 171554</a> <a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=171554&action=edit" title="141925_emptyParaTocEntriesB.odt: a counter-example">[details]</a> 141925_emptyParaTocEntriesB.odt: a counter-example Insert a TOC in this document, and it will simulate what could happen to documents if OP's suggestion is followed. There are some compatibility issues at stake here as well. My take on the issue is that you design your documents based on what the program provides. Rarely would chapter numbering be so fluid that it requires numbering to handle it. Rarely are empty numberings deployed. (In fact, pressing "Enter" after one of these REMOVES it.) Based on the difficulty in actually implementing empty-paragraph-numbering, update-TOC compatibility concerns, and a potential argument from the opposite side, I suggest WONTFIX.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>