<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - Using dummy version of images (thumbnails) for faster editing"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141832#c3">Comment # 3</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEEDINFO "
title="NEEDINFO - Using dummy version of images (thumbnails) for faster editing"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141832">bug 141832</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:csongor@halmai.hu" title="csongor@halmai.hu">csongor@halmai.hu</a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=141832#c2">comment #2</a>)
<span class="quote">> Both the see also bugs are about changing the resolution of the images.
> Suggestion here is to refactor the current wire frame view to provide three
> "non-destructive" choices for working with document canvas.
>
> Currently we get images/pictures visible (at resolution) or suppressed (just
> the wire frame). The new "mode", with change to the UI, would be to display
> the image as a low resolution placeholder during editing--but not changed
> for printing or publishing. The oposite of the see alsos which are
> destructive.</span >
Yes, this is totally correct. My request (this ticket) is not the duplicate of
the two tickets mentioned by @Dieter.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>