<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - find-next and find-backwards not consistent"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142219#c2">Comment # 2</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_UNCONFIRMED "
title="UNCONFIRMED - find-next and find-backwards not consistent"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142219">bug 142219</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:birnbach@posteo.de" title="birnbach@posteo.de <birnbach@posteo.de>"> <span class="fn">birnbach@posteo.de</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>Created <span class=""><a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=171959" name="attach_171959" title="demo text with open search field">attachment 171959</a> <a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=171959&action=edit" title="demo text with open search field">[details]</a></span>
demo text with open search field
A screencast will not show keyboard presses, which are essential here. However,
I enclose a screenshot and hope this explanation will help:
In the screenshot, the search field is open (lower left corner, with text
'foo') and the cursor is in it. Under these conditions search works as
expected: CTRL-G searches forward, CTRL-SHIFT-G backwards.
Now, if the cursor is placed into the document or the search field is closed
(e.g. by pressing ESC), CTRL-SHIFT-G will stop doing anything useful. CTRL-G
will repeat the last search from back when the cursor was in the search field.
As this may have been a forward or a backward search, CTRL-G may or may not
invert its behaviour.
It seems to me that CTRL-G should //always// perform a forward search and
CTRL-SHIFT-G //always// a backward search with the last search string. The
present behaviour stands in contrast to what a user is accustomed to from other
applications.</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>