<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - LO should fully expose the character style implicit in every paragraph style" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142788#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - LO should fully expose the character style implicit in every paragraph style" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142788">bug 142788</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:eyalroz1@gmx.com" title="Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz1@gmx.com>"> Eyal Rozenberg</a> <pre>(In reply to Mike Kaganski from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=142788#c5">comment #5</a>) I filed the bug this way to allow for the discussion of the qualitative vs quantitative change: Is it "expose more properties", where finally all are exposed, or is it "expose the inherent character style explicitly", which results in, at least, a different approach to the UI changes, and possibly deeper things. "Deeper" could mean, among other things: * Option to show these currently-implicit styles in the list of Character styles (using the names of their associated Paragraph Styles, and possibly with some indication of their nature, e.g. grayed-out or in parentheses) * Ability to inherit the Character style from a Character style _other_ than the parent Paragraph style's inherent character style. * Easier UI for expressing "Don't make any changes to the parent Paragraph style's default Character style". * Maybe even something with expression in the saved ODT (not sure what, I'm clueless about the format).</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>