<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Emphasis effects should support 'instantaneous' application" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142744#c7">Comment # 7</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Emphasis effects should support 'instantaneous' application" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142744">bug 142744</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:eyalroz1@gmx.com" title="Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz1@gmx.com>"> Eyal Rozenberg</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=142744#c6">comment #6</a>) > Zero is very much different than numbers in IT. Think about > multiplication/division. Heiko, of course when you allow something to be zero, you have to make sure you're not dividing by it (multiplication is generally ok). But we have a zero value for delay. And we have other zero-duration effects. So what you've described is a chore for the person introducing the change. That is at most a reason to reduce implementation priority, not a counter-argument against feature usefulness. Plus, again - there could be a toggle for have/don't have duration.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>