<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - HTML exports a vey low quality - 8 bit 142 x 122 Pixels GIF - shape (smiley face)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142886#c6">Comment # 6</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed"
title="RESOLVED DUPLICATE - HTML exports a vey low quality - 8 bit 142 x 122 Pixels GIF - shape (smiley face)"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142886">bug 142886</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:telesto@surfxs.nl" title="Telesto <telesto@surfxs.nl>"> <span class="fn">Telesto</span></a>
</span></b>
<pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=142886#c4">comment #4</a>)
<span class="quote">> Personally I'd drop HTML export but (a few or some) users want this to
> remain in the office suite.</span >
No strong opinion. It's more topic about amount of effort to maintain and
number of users.. Somewhat existing, partly broken, barely support simply bad
for reputation.
But well no clue how the HTML reused. Is EPUB relying on it for example?</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>