<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Standard filters involving "greater than" or "smaller than" (>, <, >=, <=) fail and hide everything" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142910#c1">Comment # 1</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Standard filters involving "greater than" or "smaller than" (>, <, >=, <=) fail and hide everything" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142910">bug 142910</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:stephane.guillou@member.fsf.org" title="stragu <stephane.guillou@member.fsf.org>"> stragu</a> <pre>Created <a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=172968" name="attach_172968" title="example spreadsheet showing the issue, created with LO 7.3">attachment 172968</a> <a href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=172968&action=edit" title="example spreadsheet showing the issue, created with LO 7.3">[details]</a> example spreadsheet showing the issue, created with LO 7.3 This example spreadsheet has one sheet per common numeric conditional operator: =, <, >, <=, >=, <>. The issue can be seen in sheets 2, 3, 4 and 5. It was created with Calc 7.3.0 alpha0+. This file could probably be used for a test once the regression is fixed? (Note that opening this file in a version that does not have the regression still displays the wrong filtering.)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>