<html>
<head>
<base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/">
</head>
<body>
<p>
<div>
<b><a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Use Kahan summation algorithm for "+" and "-" operators"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142933#c1">Comment # 1</a>
on <a class="bz_bug_link
bz_status_NEW "
title="NEW - Use Kahan summation algorithm for "+" and "-" operators"
href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142933">bug 142933</a>
from <span class="vcard"><a class="email" href="mailto:dante19031999@gmail.com" title="dante19031999@gmail.com">dante19031999@gmail.com</a>
</span></b>
<pre>Summation of 2/3 terms won't really benefit much from Kahan.
Let's hope there are not much extreme cases.
tokenizer falls out of range of my knowledge. And also have to finish Kahan AVX
once I finish my exams and some starmath related projects.
Maybe it would be wise to modify the function wizard and specify in the
description of SUM function that Kahan is being used. That they're different
things and also notice in the documentation. Affectd file:
<a href="https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/inc/scfuncs.hrc?r=24552a0b#955">https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/sc/inc/scfuncs.hrc?r=24552a0b#955</a>
/core/sc/inc/scfuncs.hrc:955</pre>
</div>
</p>
<hr>
<span>You are receiving this mail because:</span>
<ul>
<li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li>
</ul>
</body>
</html>