<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Impress slide transition sounds do not loop (64-bit Win only)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143527#c8">Comment # 8</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Impress slide transition sounds do not loop (64-bit Win only)" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143527">bug 143527</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:baron@caesar.elte.hu" title="Aron Budea <baron@caesar.elte.hu>"> Aron Budea</a> <pre>(In reply to Timur from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=143527#c7">comment #7</a>) > As for importance, 2 reasons: > - this is a general LO feature, which doesn't work for any user (and all are > on 64-bit now), not a problem with single document, so may be considered > major, and more important: > - this is a regression, and all regressions should have one step higher > importance, i.e. high and not medium. Thanks for giving a reasoning, I agree with having one step higher priority for regressions in general, at the same time the importance should probably be unaffected by this. I'd also think looping the sound is a minor extension of being able to play sounds, which works (there's probably a reason why the regression was first reported 5 years after it was introduced). However, if there's consensus the priority should be higher here, please don't mind me, and go ahead.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>