<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - HTML-Export: Doctype doesn't coincide with end of Standalone-Tag" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126879#c4">Comment # 4</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - HTML-Export: Doctype doesn't coincide with end of Standalone-Tag" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126879">bug 126879</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:robert@familiegrosskopf.de" title="Robert Großkopf <robert@familiegrosskopf.de>"> Robert Großkopf</a> <pre>(In reply to Andreas Heinisch from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=126879#c3">comment #3</a>) > The definitions currently in use are the following: > > #define OOO_STRING_SVTOOLS_HTML_doctype40 "HTML PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN\" has to be replaced by "html\" > #define OOO_STRING_SVTOOLS_XHTML_doctype11 > \ > "html PUBLIC \"-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0//EN\" " > \ > "\"<a href="http://www.w3.org/Math/DTD/mathml2/xhtml-math11-f.dtd">http://www.w3.org/Math/DTD/mathml2/xhtml-math11-f.dtd</a>\"" > > Are these both obsolete now? Don't know. See <a href="https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-math/2003Jun/0041.html">https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-math/2003Jun/0041.html</a> Seems it sometimes it better not using a doctype at all because the browser would try to fetch the whole DTD I have only seen the difference between HTML4 and HTML5. And the declaration of HTML4 and standalone tags like is a bug. The other doctypes are for xhtml-files and works well here.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>