<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Do not show inactive menu items" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144160#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED WONTFIX - Do not show inactive menu items" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144160">bug 144160</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:TorrAB@Yahoo.com" title="TorrAB@Yahoo.com">TorrAB@Yahoo.com</a> <pre>(In reply to V Stuart Foote from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=144160#c1">comment #1</a>) > Not a fan. It is inherently obvious that a grey'd out menu item is not > available. ● yes, but… why bother? Does a store advertize items that are NOT offered for sale? > Also, it is completely the legacy for OOo. ● Legacy? What may have seemed (at the beginning) like a good concept turns out to be cumbersome, but must be kept because we inherited it? ● As to implementation: It must as easy for the developer to skip (or delete) an unavailable item as it is to format it greyed-out.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>