<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Macro fails working properly after upgrading to 7.2" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144259#c3">Comment # 3</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEEDINFO " title="NEEDINFO - Macro fails working properly after upgrading to 7.2" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144259">bug 144259</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:cslam@mail.com" title="CSLam <cslam@mail.com>"> CSLam</a> <pre>Sorry that it is felt insufficient data has been provided. What's Experienced and Expected: I believe such has been described. It is true that no reproducible steps have been provided, and in this situation only a sample file will illustrate the point. The file is not provided because, as I see the situation: macro behavior only changes when transiting from ver 7.1.5.2 ver 7.2.0.4, and this is clear enough a general issue with ver 7.2.0.4 - same macro working in older versions but not the new one, implying a very high possibility of something happening with the new version application. I therefore think that the first step is to verify if indeed there are changes introduced ending in affecting macro behaviour, whether intentional or unintentional. For example in a previous version change, the use of "#" in hyperlink is amended (or rectified), thus once said everybody knows why the new behaviour of hyperlinks in the then new version LibreOffice (ENDCODEURL needed as a fix). If at this point the situation cannot be followed up, just let it be, and be aware of a potential issue with macros, as chance is there that other issues will surface, affecting some other users.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>