<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Dates are not correctly auto-extrapolated if exclude days" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144377#c2">Comment # 2</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_RESOLVED bz_closed" title="RESOLVED NOTABUG - Dates are not correctly auto-extrapolated if exclude days" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144377">bug 144377</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:buggymcbug@bobmail.info" title="buggymcbug@bobmail.info">buggymcbug@bobmail.info</a> <pre>> No it is not "subjective", it is objectively *not* a date. Depends on your definition of "date". It doesn't *have* to be a day, another acceptable definition is: "a Point in time". A particular month is by that definition a date: <a href="https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/date#Noun_2">https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/date#Noun_2</a> (#3) Either way, even if you believe that ISO8601 isn't a valid date without the day (which is fine, it is a standard, hence subjective), a user-specified date that is of type YYYY-MM seems like a perfectly valid date to me. Calc knows this is a date because I've told it that it is. Given this it seems reasonable to assume it should be know that 2019-12 is followed by 2020-01. At least, I'd consider that a bug in my own programs.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>