<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Harmony in position settings of different objects" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132864#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Harmony in position settings of different objects" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132864">bug 132864</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:dgp-mail@gmx.de" title="Dieter <dgp-mail@gmx.de>"> Dieter</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=132864#c7">comment #7</a>) > whether NAB or INVALID, point is that I don't see need for the same setting > over different objects. Maybe I'm wrong and you get other opinions. Heiko, as far as I understand Telesto, that is not the main idea of this report. Since we haven't a guideline for anchoring (and a guideline could also define different solutions for different objects), it is very difficult to assess for users and also for people in QA, if a behaviour is expected or not and - if it isn't expected - what should be the desired result. Of course we can alway say "Let's ask Design-Team" but that produces a lot of work for Design-Team (and especially for you). So an overview about anchoring would reduce work and would make QA more efficient. So bug summary might be wrong and perhaps it's not a valid bug report, but I support that idea (Telesto, do I understand you correctly?)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>