<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Under-engineered and inconsistent overflow/extension direction choice incl. with cell edit mode" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144296#c9">Comment # 9</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_NEW " title="NEW - Under-engineered and inconsistent overflow/extension direction choice incl. with cell edit mode" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144296">bug 144296</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:eyalroz1@gmx.com" title="Eyal Rozenberg <eyalroz1@gmx.com>"> Eyal Rozenberg</a> <pre>(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=144296#c8">comment #8</a>) By the way, this is how it's like in Excel 2010: * Excel has "General" cell alignment which we don't; it also has "Context" cell direction. I'm not 100% sure how those are defined. * Same extension/overflow directions when editing and after editing; the only change is that during an edit, you see your text over adjacent cells' content. * Cell extension/overflow direction is based ON CELL ALIGNMENT ONLY - completely disregarding the direction of the cell and the sheet. * In "General" alignment, the extension/overflow direction seems to be decided by the directionality of the first character typed into the cell when its empty (and later it gets weird, there might even be a bug somewhere)</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>