<html> <head> <base href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/"> </head> <body> <div> <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Allow to open linked documents when trying to edit protected sections" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144350#c6">Comment # 6</a> on <a class="bz_bug_link bz_status_UNCONFIRMED " title="UNCONFIRMED - Allow to open linked documents when trying to edit protected sections" href="https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144350">bug 144350</a> from <a class="email" href="mailto:mikekaganski@hotmail.com" title="Mike Kaganski <mikekaganski@hotmail.com>"> Mike Kaganski</a> <pre>(In reply to Heiko Tietze from <a href="show_bug.cgi?id=144350#c5">comment #5</a>) > If the context doesn't apply, hide the control. Which is exactly what I mentioned: you need to provide the information from the action into the dialog. And note the current logic: now the action checks if there is *any* locked content affected by *any* operation; often it doesn't need to analyze everything, and may break when encountered *the first* locked element affected. What would need to be done is to analyze *everything* (to build the correct context for the interaction), which would introduce this complexity into all actions that could potentially give this warning; the analysis before the interaction would take longer (for bigger selections). It might make sense, though - but I don't think it's an easy change at all.</pre> </div> <hr> You are receiving this mail because: <ul> <li>You are the assignee for the bug.</li> </ul> </body> </html>