[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: configure.ac

David Tardon dtardon at redhat.com
Fri Jun 7 01:43:04 PDT 2013


 configure.ac |   10 +++-------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

New commits:
commit 36edf2e6fff430beeb35882b408ceb01453a9e18
Author: David Tardon <dtardon at redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Jun 7 10:40:54 2013 +0200

    simplify check for harfbuzz
    
    We check for it in both branches of the if, right? So why do not drop it
    entirely?
    
    Change-Id: I715bfb55c02c5425bbb4874b97aca9d2872acced

diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac
index ff19a0d..0be2012 100644
--- a/configure.ac
+++ b/configure.ac
@@ -8388,14 +8388,10 @@ AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether to enable HarfBuzz support])
 if test "$_os" != "WINNT" -a "$_os" != "Darwin"; then
     AC_MSG_RESULT([yes])
     ENABLE_HARFBUZZ="TRUE"
-    if test "$with_system_harfbuzz" = "yes" -o "$with_system_libs" = "yes"; then
-	if $PKG_CONFIG --atleast-version 0.9.18 harfbuzz; then
-		libo_CHECK_SYSTEM_MODULE([harfbuzz],[HARFBUZZ],[harfbuzz-icu >= 0.9.18])
-	else
-    		libo_CHECK_SYSTEM_MODULE([harfbuzz],[HARFBUZZ],[harfbuzz >= 0.9.10])
-        fi
+    if $PKG_CONFIG --atleast-version 0.9.18 harfbuzz; then
+        libo_CHECK_SYSTEM_MODULE([harfbuzz],[HARFBUZZ],[harfbuzz-icu >= 0.9.18])
     else
-    	libo_CHECK_SYSTEM_MODULE([harfbuzz],[HARFBUZZ],[harfbuzz >= 0.9.10])
+        libo_CHECK_SYSTEM_MODULE([harfbuzz],[HARFBUZZ],[harfbuzz >= 0.9.10])
     fi
 else
     AC_MSG_RESULT([no])


More information about the Libreoffice-commits mailing list