[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: 2 commits - sc/qa
Kohei Yoshida
kohei.yoshida at gmail.com
Tue May 21 17:49:28 PDT 2013
sc/qa/unit/ucalc.cxx | 152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
1 file changed, 73 insertions(+), 79 deletions(-)
New commits:
commit df4d6b134bfe45e380416f0d9eecb482843e8a47
Author: Kohei Yoshida <kohei.yoshida at gmail.com>
Date: Tue May 21 20:48:42 2013 -0400
Disable the perf test for dbgutil build.
Change-Id: Ifd95ea4f88175b9010f93a4a064be5d908b2a224
diff --git a/sc/qa/unit/ucalc.cxx b/sc/qa/unit/ucalc.cxx
index 8248419..c48d310 100644
--- a/sc/qa/unit/ucalc.cxx
+++ b/sc/qa/unit/ucalc.cxx
@@ -283,7 +283,9 @@ public:
void testCondFormatINSDEL();
CPPUNIT_TEST_SUITE(Test);
+#ifndef DBG_UTIL
CPPUNIT_TEST(testPerf);
+#endif
CPPUNIT_TEST(testCollator);
CPPUNIT_TEST(testRangeList);
CPPUNIT_TEST(testInput);
commit 7141c7517db5bbb9814308aa4c68bc95beb4de8c
Author: Michael Meeks <michael.meeks at suse.com>
Date: Tue May 21 16:27:09 2013 +0100
make calc tests use some sort of pseudo-cycle measurement
Change-Id: I9f58a7b00a6e4441c08254ef99829fab805beef8
diff --git a/sc/qa/unit/ucalc.cxx b/sc/qa/unit/ucalc.cxx
index 59201d4..8248419 100644
--- a/sc/qa/unit/ucalc.cxx
+++ b/sc/qa/unit/ucalc.cxx
@@ -445,11 +445,20 @@ public:
class MeasureTimeSwitch
{
double& mrDiff;
+ double mnScale;
TimeValue maTimeBefore;
public:
MeasureTimeSwitch(double& rDiff) : mrDiff(rDiff)
{
mrDiff = 9999.0;
+ mnScale = 1.0;
+ osl_getSystemTime(&maTimeBefore);
+ }
+ // Scaled pseudo-time
+ MeasureTimeSwitch(double& rDiff, const double nScale ) : mrDiff(rDiff)
+ {
+ mrDiff = 9999.0;
+ mnScale = nScale;
osl_getSystemTime(&maTimeBefore);
}
@@ -457,7 +466,7 @@ public:
{
TimeValue aTimeAfter;
osl_getSystemTime(&aTimeAfter);
- mrDiff = getTimeDiff(aTimeAfter, maTimeBefore);
+ mrDiff = getTimeDiff(aTimeAfter, maTimeBefore) / mnScale;
}
};
@@ -486,25 +495,58 @@ void Test::tearDown()
BootstrapFixture::tearDown();
}
+#define PERF_ASSERT(df,time,message) \
+ do { \
+ if ((df) >= (time)) \
+ { \
+ std::ostringstream os; \
+ os << message << " took " << diff << " psuedo-cycles, expected: " << time; \
+ /* debugging - fprintf (stderr, "'%s'\n", os.str().c_str()); */ \
+ CPPUNIT_FAIL(os.str().c_str()); \
+ } \
+ } while (0)
+
void Test::testPerf()
{
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_MESSAGE ("failed to insert sheet", m_pDoc->InsertTab (0, "foo"));
- double diff = 9999.0;
+ // First do a set of simple operations to try to work out
+ // how fast (or not) this particular machine is:
+ double scale;
+ {
+ MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(scale);
+ for (int i = 0; i < 10000000; ++i)
+ {
+ // Bang on the allocator
+ volatile ScRange *pRange = new ScRange (ScAddress (0,0,0));
+ // Calc does quite a bit of string conversion
+ volatile double it = OUString::number ((double)i/253.0).toDouble();
+ // Do we have floating point math ?
+ volatile double another = rtl::math::sin (it);
+ (void)another;
+ delete pRange;
+ }
+ }
+ printf("CPU scale factor %g\n", scale);
+
+ // FIXME: we should check if this already took too long
+ // and if so not run the perf. tests to have pity on some
+ // slow ARM machines - I think.
+
+ // to make the numbers more round and helpful,
+ // but the calculation of scale reasonably precise.
+ scale /= 100000.0;
+
+ double diff;
// Clearing an already empty sheet should finish in a fraction of a
// second. Flag failure if it takes more than one second. Clearing 100
// columns should be large enough to flag if something goes wrong.
{
- MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff);
+ MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff, scale);
clearRange(m_pDoc, ScRange(0,0,0,99,MAXROW,0));
}
- if (diff >= 1.0)
- {
- std::ostringstream os;
- os << "Clearing an empty sheet took " << diff << " seconds. It should be instant.";
- CPPUNIT_FAIL(os.str().c_str());
- }
+ PERF_ASSERT(diff, 1.0, "Clearing an empty sheet");
{
// Switch to R1C1 to make it easier to input relative references in multiple cells.
@@ -519,15 +561,10 @@ void Test::testPerf()
// Now, Delete B2:B100000. This should complete in a fraction of a second
// (0.06 sec on my machine).
{
- MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff);
+ MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff, scale);
clearRange(m_pDoc, ScRange(1,1,0,1,99999,0));
}
- if (diff >= 1.0)
- {
- std::ostringstream os;
- os << "Removal of a large array of formula cells took " << diff << " seconds. It should be instant.";
- CPPUNIT_FAIL(os.str().c_str());
- }
+ PERF_ASSERT(diff, 2000, "Removal of a large array of formula cells");
}
clearRange(m_pDoc, ScRange(0,0,0,1,MAXROW,0)); // Clear columns A:B.
@@ -558,15 +595,10 @@ void Test::testPerf()
aMark.SetMarkArea(aPasteRange);
{
- MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff);
+ MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff, scale);
m_pDoc->CopyFromClip(aPasteRange, aMark, IDF_CONTENTS, pUndoDoc, &aClipDoc);
}
- if (diff >= 1.0)
- {
- std::ostringstream os;
- os << "Pasting a single cell to A2:A100000 took " << diff << " seconds. It should be instant.";
- CPPUNIT_FAIL(os.str().c_str());
- }
+ PERF_ASSERT(diff, 1500.0, "Pasting a single cell to A2:A100000");
ScDocument* pRedoDoc = new ScDocument(SCDOCMODE_UNDO);
pRedoDoc->InitUndo(m_pDoc, 0, 0);
@@ -581,15 +613,10 @@ void Test::testPerf()
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(m_pDoc->GetString(aPos), m_pDoc->GetString(aPasteRange.aEnd));
{
- MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff);
+ MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff, scale);
aUndo.Undo();
}
- if (diff >= 1.0)
- {
- std::ostringstream os;
- os << "Undoing a pasting of a cell to A2:A100000 took " << diff << " seconds. It should be instant.";
- CPPUNIT_FAIL(os.str().c_str());
- }
+ PERF_ASSERT(diff, 500.0, "Undoing a pasting of a cell to A2:A100000");
// Make sure it's really undone.
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(CELLTYPE_STRING, m_pDoc->GetCellType(aPos));
@@ -598,15 +625,10 @@ void Test::testPerf()
// Now redo.
{
- MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff);
+ MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff, scale);
aUndo.Redo();
}
- if (diff >= 1.0)
- {
- std::ostringstream os;
- os << "Redoing a pasting of a cell to A2:A100000 took " << diff << " seconds. It should be instant.";
- CPPUNIT_FAIL(os.str().c_str());
- }
+ PERF_ASSERT(diff, 1000.0, "Redoing a pasting of a cell to A2:A100000");
// Make sure it's really redone.
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(m_pDoc->GetString(aPos), m_pDoc->GetString(aPasteRange.aStart));
@@ -644,15 +666,10 @@ void Test::testPerf()
aMark.SetMarkArea(aPasteRange);
{
- MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff);
+ MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff, scale);
m_pDoc->CopyFromClip(aPasteRange, aMark, IDF_CONTENTS, pUndoDoc, &aClipDoc);
}
- if (diff >= 1.0)
- {
- std::ostringstream os;
- os << "Pasting A1:A2 to A3:A100001 took " << diff << " seconds. It should be instant.";
- CPPUNIT_FAIL(os.str().c_str());
- }
+ PERF_ASSERT(diff, 1000.0, "Pasting A1:A2 to A3:A100001");
ScDocument* pRedoDoc = new ScDocument(SCDOCMODE_UNDO);
pRedoDoc->InitUndo(m_pDoc, 0, 0);
@@ -670,15 +687,10 @@ void Test::testPerf()
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(CELLTYPE_NONE, m_pDoc->GetCellType(aTmp));
{
- MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff);
+ MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff, scale);
aUndo.Undo();
}
- if (diff >= 1.0)
- {
- std::ostringstream os;
- os << "Undoing took " << diff << " seconds. It should be instant.";
- CPPUNIT_FAIL(os.str().c_str());
- }
+ PERF_ASSERT(diff, 500.0, "Undoing");
// Make sure it's really undone.
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(CELLTYPE_VALUE, m_pDoc->GetCellType(aPos));
@@ -687,15 +699,10 @@ void Test::testPerf()
// Now redo.
{
- MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff);
+ MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff, scale);
aUndo.Redo();
}
- if (diff >= 1.0)
- {
- std::ostringstream os;
- os << "Redoing took " << diff << " seconds. It should be instant.";
- CPPUNIT_FAIL(os.str().c_str());
- }
+ PERF_ASSERT(diff, 800.0, "Redoing");
// Make sure it's really redone.
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(m_pDoc->GetString(aPos), m_pDoc->GetString(aPasteRange.aStart));
@@ -736,15 +743,10 @@ void Test::testPerf()
aMark.SetMarkArea(aPasteRange);
{
- MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff);
+ MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff, scale);
m_pDoc->CopyFromClip(aPasteRange, aMark, IDF_CONTENTS, pUndoDoc, &aClipDoc);
}
- if (diff >= 1.0)
- {
- std::ostringstream os;
- os << "Pasting took " << diff << " seconds. It should be instant.";
- CPPUNIT_FAIL(os.str().c_str());
- }
+ PERF_ASSERT(diff, 2000.0, "Pasting");
ScDocument* pRedoDoc = new ScDocument(SCDOCMODE_UNDO);
pRedoDoc->InitUndo(m_pDoc, 0, 0);
@@ -763,15 +765,10 @@ void Test::testPerf()
#if 0 // TODO: Undo and redo of this scenario is currently not fast enough to be tested reliably.
{
- MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff);
+ MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff, scale);
aUndo.Undo();
}
- if (diff >= 1.0)
- {
- std::ostringstream os;
- os << "Undoing took " << diff << " seconds. It should be instant.";
- CPPUNIT_FAIL(os.str().c_str());
- }
+ PERF_ASSERT(diff, 1.0, "Undoing");
// Make sure it's really undone.
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(CELLTYPE_FORMULA, m_pDoc->GetCellType(aPos));
@@ -780,15 +777,10 @@ void Test::testPerf()
// Now redo.
{
- MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff);
+ MeasureTimeSwitch aTime(diff, scale);
aUndo.Redo();
}
- if (diff >= 1.0)
- {
- std::ostringstream os;
- os << "Redoing took " << diff << " seconds. It should be instant.";
- CPPUNIT_FAIL(os.str().c_str());
- }
+ PERF_ASSERT(diff, 1.0, "Redoing");
// Make sure it's really redone.
CPPUNIT_ASSERT_EQUAL(CELLTYPE_FORMULA, m_pDoc->GetCellType(aPasteRange.aStart));
More information about the Libreoffice-commits
mailing list