[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-5-3' - sw/source

[Michael Stahl]

 sw/source/core/doc/CntntIdxStore.cxx |    6 ++++++
 sw/source/core/inc/MarkManager.hxx   |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+)

New commits:
commit 75a1dce57f7038bc88c74c4e50dd22306be8cf61
Author: Michael Stahl <mstahl at redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Jul 28 23:44:53 2017 +0200

    tdf#105705 sw: sort bookmarks in ContentIdxStoreImpl::RestoreBkmks()
    
    The problem here is that the SplitNode() calls in SwRTFReader::Read()
    destroy the order of the bookmarks, which causes an assert later
    from the std::lower_bound() when a new mark is created.
    
    The 2 marks that cause the problem are:
    SwPosition (node 5, offset 0)
    SwPosition (node 5, offset 0), SwPosition (node 5, offset 0)
    
    During the 2 SplitNode calls, the second one is corrected by
    ContentIdxStore and remains on 5, but the first one is not and
    becomes:
    SwPosition (node 7, offset 0)
    
    ContentIdxStoreImpl::SaveBkmks() does different things when a
    mark position is exactly on the parameter position: if it has
    only one position, it is ignored, but if it has a second
    position, then both its positions are corrected.
    
    It is not possible to change the sort order so that marks with
    one position are sorted behind marks with 2 positions, because
    while SplitNode() corrects marks "backward", JoinNode() uses
    ContentIdxStore to correct marks "forward"; hence manually sort
    the marks.
    
    Change-Id: If5b35f18bfd47ffe98c0f67e84d380ca801411a3
    (cherry picked from commit f2d2093b2198bd4c65475a60329a5a6a7a8575f1)
    Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/40544
    Tested-by: Jenkins <ci at libreoffice.org>
    Reviewed-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com>
    Tested-by: Caolán McNamara <caolanm at redhat.com>

diff --git a/sw/source/core/doc/CntntIdxStore.cxx b/sw/source/core/doc/CntntIdxStore.cxx
index fafb771ab490..dee0a89f5c0a 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/doc/CntntIdxStore.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/doc/CntntIdxStore.cxx
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 #include <doc.hxx>
 #include <IDocumentRedlineAccess.hxx>
 #include <IDocumentLayoutAccess.hxx>
+#include <MarkManager.hxx>
 #include <docary.hxx>
 #include <editsh.hxx>
 #include <fmtanchr.hxx>
@@ -265,6 +266,11 @@ void ContentIdxStoreImpl::RestoreBkmks(SwDoc* pDoc, updater_t& rUpdater)
             SetRightMarkPos(pMark, aEntry.m_bOther, &aNewPos);
         }
     }
+    if (!m_aBkmkEntries.empty())
+    {   // tdf#105705 sort bookmarks because SaveBkmks special handling of
+        // "bMarkPosEqual" may destroy sort order
+        dynamic_cast<sw::mark::MarkManager*>(pMarkAccess)->sortMarks();
+    }
 }
 
 void ContentIdxStoreImpl::SaveRedlines(SwDoc* pDoc, sal_uLong nNode, sal_Int32 nContent)
diff --git a/sw/source/core/inc/MarkManager.hxx b/sw/source/core/inc/MarkManager.hxx
index bc0aecd6064a..093e11855bcb 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/inc/MarkManager.hxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/inc/MarkManager.hxx
@@ -101,7 +101,9 @@ namespace sw {
 
             // make names
             OUString getUniqueMarkName(const OUString& rName) const;
+        public: // FIXME should be private, needs refactor
             void sortMarks();
+        private:
             void sortSubsetMarks();
 
             // container for all marks