[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-5-3' - sw/source

[Michael Stahl]

 sw/source/core/doc/DocumentContentOperationsManager.cxx |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

New commits:
commit 3ddc16fc26a06a95b7e373ee930881f91b22ad1f
Author: Michael Stahl <mstahl at redhat.com>
Date:   Fri Aug 18 17:25:17 2017 +0200

    tdf#99692 sw: fix the fix: don't set bNullContent if node was split
    
    When showing the redlines in rhbz908615-13.odt, the following assertion
    happens:
    
    Assertion `IDocumentMarkAccess::IsLegalPaMForCrossRefHeadingBookmark(rPaM) && "<CrossRefBookmark::CrossRefBookmark(..)>" "- creation of cross-reference bookmark with an illegal PaM that does not expand over exactly one whole paragraph."' failed.
    
    This is because in DocumentContentOperationsManager::MoveRange() the
    flag bNullContent is set after the node has been split; in this case the
    nContent is of course always 0.
    
    Later the function then restores aSavePam to the index 0 of the next
    node, when it actually shouldn't do anything because the JoinNext()
    already positioned it correctly at the merge-index of the re-joined node.
    
    (regression from 850795942b3e168cab8ce88b4f2b421945ff29ca)
    
    Change-Id: I64d50e70b19e2fd81537a9771fa8706898b17642
    (cherry picked from commit 6a018363791945b6fd7f04f2aa311e4f4753f6aa)
    Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/41305
    Tested-by: Jenkins <ci at libreoffice.org>
    Reviewed-by: Christian Lohmaier <lohmaier+LibreOffice at googlemail.com>

diff --git a/sw/source/core/doc/DocumentContentOperationsManager.cxx b/sw/source/core/doc/DocumentContentOperationsManager.cxx
index d6e014e474ec..4150718228fb 100644
--- a/sw/source/core/doc/DocumentContentOperationsManager.cxx
+++ b/sw/source/core/doc/DocumentContentOperationsManager.cxx
@@ -2031,7 +2031,8 @@ bool DocumentContentOperationsManager::MoveRange( SwPaM& rPaM, SwPosition& rPos,
     // the manipulated range.
     // tdf#99692 don't Move() back if that would end up in another node
     // because moving backward is not necessarily the inverse of forward then.
-    const bool bNullContent = aSavePam.GetPoint()->nContent == 0;
+    // (but do Move() back if we have split the node)
+    const bool bNullContent = !bSplit && aSavePam.GetPoint()->nContent == 0;
     if( bNullContent )
     {
         aSavePam.GetPoint()->nNode--;