[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: Branch 'libreoffice-6-0' - sc/source

[Eike Rathke]

 sc/source/core/tool/compiler.cxx |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

New commits:
commit b030bf19e29f031b0a640dd92c38d654785f1a99
Author: Eike Rathke <erack at redhat.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 11 18:21:32 2017 +0100

    Resolves: tdf#114406 treat % as the operator that it is
    
    Regression from
    
        commit 73c7e0921d752df53004ed55735f3e8888cc592f
        Date:   Tue Sep 20 21:39:10 2016 +0200
    
            sc-perf: tdf#79023 for ODFF do not call SvNumberFormatter to determine numeric
    
    for ODFF, and for OOXML
    
        commit a8a8ff59c5749bbe1f2f58ea8fd42d66e6ae2a81
        Date:   Tue Sep 20 22:37:59 2016 +0200
    
            sc-perf: tdf#79023 do not call SvNumberFormatter also for numbers in OOXML
    
    Numbers followed by a percent operator like 100% were always
    (wrongly) treated as one entity (by '%' having ScCharFlags::Value)
    and incidentally handled by the number formatter's parser, which
    so far "worked" in the sense that the correct constant number was
    produced (i.e. 1 here), but the expression detail was lost.
    
    The commits above for performance reasons when reading ODF or
    OOXML files don't let a symbol pass through the number formatter's
    parser anymore and the "100%" does not represent a strict number,
    so lead to #NAME? error at the end.
    
    Set the proper flags in the compiler's character table to treat
    '%' as operator in all circumstances.
    
    Change-Id: I266beb74a313c779370e5fac42f45d0fb5cdba0c
    (cherry picked from commit f6b2349e880afa82f9267087fb48b6e4f8a9aa05)
    Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/46254
    Reviewed-by: Eike Rathke <erack at redhat.com>
    Tested-by: Jenkins <ci at libreoffice.org>

diff --git a/sc/source/core/tool/compiler.cxx b/sc/source/core/tool/compiler.cxx
index 8f74f42276a4..3c6365a5e7c6 100644
--- a/sc/source/core/tool/compiler.cxx
+++ b/sc/source/core/tool/compiler.cxx
@@ -323,7 +323,7 @@ ScCompiler::Convention::Convention( FormulaGrammar::AddressConvention eConv )
 /* $ */     t[36] = ScCharFlags::CharWord | ScCharFlags::Word | ScCharFlags::CharIdent | ScCharFlags::Ident;
             if (FormulaGrammar::CONV_ODF == meConv)
 /* $ */         t[36] |= ScCharFlags::OdfNameMarker;
-/* % */     t[37] = ScCharFlags::Value;
+/* % */     t[37] = ScCharFlags::Char | ScCharFlags::WordSep | ScCharFlags::ValueSep;
 /* & */     t[38] = ScCharFlags::Char | ScCharFlags::WordSep | ScCharFlags::ValueSep;
 /* ' */     t[39] = ScCharFlags::NameSep;
 /* ( */     t[40] = ScCharFlags::Char | ScCharFlags::WordSep | ScCharFlags::ValueSep;