[Libreoffice-commits] core.git: sc/source

[Tor Lillqvist]

 sc/source/ui/unoobj/tokenuno.cxx |    3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

New commits:
commit e86d604dc4e12fc9c494484d3f261d91e9d8b01e
Author: Tor Lillqvist <tml at collabora.com>
Date:   Thu Mar 30 12:22:49 2017 +0300

    The svError case is probably not worth a SAL_WARN
    
    Also, sort the cases of that block in order of the enumerators.
    
    Change-Id: If46a4ff73d6f7d22bd54b74610eb6eebecd5aff0

diff --git a/sc/source/ui/unoobj/tokenuno.cxx b/sc/source/ui/unoobj/tokenuno.cxx
index 2ff0615edf56..cb767923743e 100644
--- a/sc/source/ui/unoobj/tokenuno.cxx
+++ b/sc/source/ui/unoobj/tokenuno.cxx
@@ -468,9 +468,10 @@ bool ScTokenConversion::ConvertToTokenSequence( const ScDocument& rDoc,
                 default:
                     SAL_WARN("sc",  "ScTokenConversion::ConvertToTokenSequence: unhandled token type " << StackVarEnumToString(rToken.GetType()));
                     SAL_FALLTHROUGH;
-                case svSep:     // occurs with ocSep, ocOpen, ocClose, ocArray*
                 case svJump:    // occurs with ocIf, ocChoose
+                case svError:   // seems to be fairly common, and probably not exceptional and not worth a warning?
                 case svMissing: // occurs with ocMissing
+                case svSep:     // occurs with ocSep, ocOpen, ocClose, ocArray*
                     rAPI.Data.clear();      // no data
             }
             rAPI.OpCode = static_cast<sal_Int32>(eOpCode);      //! assuming equal values for the moment