[Libreoffice-qa] do not update MAB without a comment - was: Re: [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

MiguelAngel mariosv at miguelangel.mobi
Wed Apr 18 15:11:00 PDT 2012

El 18/04/12 20:19, Pedro escribió:
> Michael Stahl-2 wrote
>> imho to
>> prevent this abuse the priorities should be settable only by experienced
>> QA or developers, not by everybody.
> Having done such mistakes in the past (still doing?) I couldn't agree more.
> Michael Stahl-2 wrote
>> but what really gets my attention these days is a "regression" keyword.
> Excellent :) Regressions are indeed the worst form of getting people
> unhappy. Getting stuck on something that used to work and doesn't any more
> is more frustrating that something that never worked :)
> --
> View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-do-not-update-MAB-without-a-comment-was-Re-Bug-37361-LibreOffice-3-5-most-annoying-bus-tp3919364p3920906.html
> Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
> Mail address: Libreoffice-qa at lists.freedesktop.org
> Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
> Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

I have remarked sometimes about this.

Regression are the worst, specially those what change the results 
without notice, more critic in calc. And those what leads a crash.

I believe the regressions must be have the high priority, and IMHO solve 
the regressions make easy the development, because avoid crossing bugs 
with new improvements.

Miguel Ángel.

More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list