[Libreoffice-qa] do not update MAB without a comment - was: Re: [Bug 37361] LibreOffice 3.5 most annoying bugs

[MiguelAngel]

El 18/04/12 20:19, Pedro escribió:
>
> Michael Stahl-2 wrote
>>
>> imho to
>> prevent this abuse the priorities should be settable only by experienced
>> QA or developers, not by everybody.
>>
>
> Having done such mistakes in the past (still doing?) I couldn't agree more.
>
>
> Michael Stahl-2 wrote
>>
>> but what really gets my attention these days is a "regression" keyword.
>>
>
> Excellent :) Regressions are indeed the worst form of getting people
> unhappy. Getting stuck on something that used to work and doesn't any more
> is more frustrating that something that never worked :)
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-do-not-update-MAB-without-a-comment-was-Re-Bug-37361-LibreOffice-3-5-most-annoying-bus-tp3919364p3920906.html
> Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> List Name: Libreoffice-qa mailing list
> Mail address: Libreoffice-qa at lists.freedesktop.org
> Change settings: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-qa
> Problems? http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
> Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
> List archive: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/

+1
I have remarked sometimes about this.

Regression are the worst, specially those what change the results 
without notice, more critic in calc. And those what leads a crash.

I believe the regressions must be have the high priority, and IMHO solve 
the regressions make easy the development, because avoid crossing bugs 
with new improvements.

Miguel Ángel.