[Libreoffice-qa] Closing NEEDINFO bugs

Bjoern Michaelsen bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com
Sun Aug 19 10:55:46 PDT 2012

Hi Flo, all,

On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 07:53:35PM +0300, Florian Reisinger wrote:
> In fact, it was a good choice... (I hope you can read this table...)

While the statistic alone do not really prove this to be good move, but there
was a consensus on the qa call(*) and the qa list that this needs to be done to
allow the QA team to keep moving and not getting bogged down in thousends of
incomplete or controversal bug reports.

Now, of course, such a bulk move will always hit some false positives. If that
is the case for one of the bugs you reported (that is: the bug is
welldocumented, complete and noncontroversial) please check:


if the bug indeed contains all the information needed and thus send it back to




(*) http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/minutes-of-the-LibreOffice-QA-Call-2012-06-29-1400UTC-td3992888.html

More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list