[Libreoffice-qa] Proposed HARDHACK
bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com
Thu Aug 30 01:53:17 PDT 2012
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 06:36:40PM -0700, Joel Madero wrote:
> We should come up with a better method of tracking vs. each of us
> making our own list. If everyone wants, they can email me and I will
> keep a combined list that we can discuss during our conference call.
> You can just email me directly "Proposed HARDHACK", I will update
> the list and 2-3 days before our meeting I'll get the document up
> for everyone to see. Sooner or later a voting method would be nice
> :) Let me know what you all think
while that would work, I wonder about avoiding the duplication. In a way, all
MABs are "Proposed HARDHACK"s. If there are ~100 MAB selecting 5 out of that
should be reasonably doable, just by highlighting the MAB here on the list.
_If_ we want to have another, smaller subset of candidates than MAB, we could
just ad-hoc tag them with ProposedHardHacks.
I fear though, that that will just end up with every MAB becoming a
Since we recently started to consider going for real after bug priotization,
how about starting with the MABs and making sure this table:
is a good base for selecting the hardhacks?
More information about the Libreoffice-qa