[Libreoffice-qa] 3.5.0 QA ... from BHS 1 to BHS 2
Cor Nouws
oolst at nouenoff.nl
Mon Jan 9 14:10:10 PST 2012
Hi Christian,
Christian Lohmaier wrote (09-01-12 02:10)
> On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 10:52 PM, Cor Nouws<oolst at nouenoff.nl> wrote:
>>
>> So time to prepare bug hunt session two.
>> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5
>> and
>>
>> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Improving_QA-Release-3.5#2nd_Bug-hunting_session
>>
>> Or is there something that should make us change our mind for that?
>
> No, not really, It should be on Saturday/Sunday this time, as a few
> people complained that they cannot attend such an event during the
> week.
Fine for me.
> But a disclaimer from my part: I won't be able to attend on Jan 21, as
> I'm invited on a birthday.
I have other responsibilities too on the 21st. No probs, people enough :-)
>> As may be read from the other thread (thread 'Evaluating first 3.5.0
>> Bug-Hunt Session' on the QA list) I'm far from sure about the impact on
>> level of issues,
>
> Yeah, impact on 3.5issues is not that big, but I think it just needs
> time for people to get used to.
>
>> but looking at the overall activity/awareness, I think it's
>> worth.
>
> Exactly what I am thinking :-)
>
>> We could send a mail to the people that submitted their fist bug during the
>> session, asking their feedback for possible improvement. Would that be OK,
>> do you think?
>
> Sure, but then the Jan 20/21st might be too close.
If it helps, it does, if not it doesn't..
>> Other hits/remarks of course appreciated as well :-)
>
> Find mentors "officially" and don't rely on people to show up for the
> second one. It did work out on the first session, but esp. for the
> follow-up event it should be sure that mentors are around.
I agree with that.
Cheers,
--
- Cor
- http://nl.libreoffice.org
More information about the Libreoffice-qa
mailing list