[Libreoffice-qa] Master builds name revisited
pedlino at gmail.com
Tue Nov 27 08:20:32 PST 2012
Almost a year ago I tried to prove to the devs that the daily build naming
scheme is useless for QA people.
(and yes, I know I said it was my final request back then...)
At the time *Lionel* proposed an epoch based naming scheme and *Björn*
mentioned a better solution
One year later, after installing (at least under Windows) there is still no
way to know if build
Version 126.96.36.199.alpha1+ (Build ID: 6aabe09ac092c51d4b394bde9c7ea0055b952e3)
was installed from
or from which Tinderbox it came from.
Any chance of improving this?
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Master-builds-name-revisited-tp4021041.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Libreoffice-qa