[Libreoffice-qa] After EOL has been reached...

[Rainer Bielefeld]

Robinson Tryon schrieb:
> Rainer, how does this plan sound to you?

Hi Robinson,

not good! We will not create complicated wrong rules for things what are 
easy to understand. And whether a Version still is useful for indicating 
where in the history a (newly reported) bug appeared has nothing to do 
with the date of the last build. So already the subject of this thread 
is misleading for this issue.

LibO-Bugzilla admins will switch old Versions to "inactive" when they 
see that no more (or very few) bugs appear newly in BZ with that 
version. That's the only indicator that counts, that already is in 
progress, no reason for concerns.

It seems that 3.4 will reach a status what sill allow to switch inactive 
the non-release versions (see statistics for last half year [1]) soon.

I would appreciate a stop of this rather useless discussion.


Rainer


[1] 
<https://bugs.freedesktop.org/report.cgi?x_axis_field=component&y_axis_field=version&z_axis_field=&query_format=report-table&short_desc_type=allwordssubstr&short_desc=&product=LibreOffice&longdesc_type=allwordssubstr&longdesc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr&status_whiteboard=&keywords_type=allwords&keywords=&bug_id=&bug_id_type=anyexact&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&emailtype3=substring&email3=&chfield=[Bug+creation]&chfieldvalue=&chfieldfrom=-180d&chfieldto=Now&j_top=AND&f1=version&o1=regexp&v1=^3.4&f2=version&o2=notsubstring&v2=release&f3=noop&o3=noop&v3=&format=table&action=wrap>