[Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...

Eike Rathke erack at redhat.com
Fri Feb 15 07:16:35 PST 2013


Hi,

On Thursday, 2013-02-14 17:08:43 +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:

> * UX input (Mirek)
> 	+ 4.0/4.x branding
> 		+ E-mail voting results:
> 		  https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AsGS28t6YMF3dHFrTm9hMzZVNk9hNEZMN0NSbV9ZbXc#gid=0

I'd much prefer if we could publish such things at places where no login
of whatever kind is needed.


> * Gerrit - unpleasant (Michael)
> 	+ "I would prefer that you didn't submit this" ->
> 		"This probably needs some tweaks before it is merged"
> 	+ "Do not submit" ->
> 		"I would prefer this not to be committed in this state."

While the rewording for -1 is fine with me and in general also better
describes why a -1 is given, I'm not satisfied with the "-2 Do not
submit" case. At least I use -2 only if the code is wrong or would break
things or omits important cases, there's no personal preferation
involved, the change should simply not be submitted. Maybe "The change
can not be committed in this state." instead would do?

  Eike

-- 
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
New GnuPG key 0x65632D3A : 2265 D7F3 A7B0 95CC 3918  630B 6A6C D5B7 6563 2D3A
Old GnuPG key 0x293C05FD : 997A 4C60 CE41 0149 0DB3  9E96 2F1A D073 293C 05FD
Support the FSFE, care about Free Software! https://fsfe.org/support/?erack
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice-qa/attachments/20130215/47a003b1/attachment.pgp>


More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list