[Libreoffice-qa] Version 4.0 UNCONFIRMED bugs

Pedro pedlino at gmail.com
Wed Jan 16 04:00:26 PST 2013

jmadero wrote
> Hi All,
> There are 15 bugs remaining that need to be triaged against 4.0, I'm
> asking
> Developer and/or QA staff to take a look at them to see if we can get this
> list down. Goal is to be down to 0 by Friday but most of these are either
> on platforms that I don't have or are beyond my skill set.

It makes more sense to leave a dynamic link than a static table (some of
these are already checked by now).


Why do you consider a REOPENED bug as UNCONFIRMED? If a user reopens a
previous bug it is a confirmation that the bug does exist so it should be
equivalent to NEW and not to UNCONFIRMED...


View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Version-4-0-UNCONFIRMED-bugs-tp4029443p4029596.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list