[Libreoffice-qa] Whiteboard Status'

Michael Stahl mstahl at redhat.com
Wed Jun 25 03:21:30 PDT 2014


On 18/06/14 17:39, Robinson Tryon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 10:15 AM, Joel Madero <jmadero.dev at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>> ConfirmedRegression
>>>>
>>>> Description: Is used if a bug is confirmed to be a regression.
>>> why do we need this, given that we have a "regression" keyword?  this is
>>> a pointless alias... developers don't search for it, the ESC bug-stats
>>> script doesn't know about it... fortunately currently only 2 bugs have it.
>> Moving to not in use - agreed regression keyword is sufficient.
> 
> AFAIK the only reason we use 'regression' in the keyword field instead
> of the whiteboard is that FDO happens to have 'regression' set as a
> keyword. To simplify our learning curve for QA, we should make a push
> for consistency.  (we can make a decision here after bugzilla
> migration)

exactly, if we can finally add the keywords that we need then we can get
rid of a lot of whiteboard entries and have bugzilla detect typos
entered in the keywords field...




More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list