[Libreoffice-qa] Version field options way too fine grained
libreoffice at kohei.us
Fri Mar 14 08:57:44 PDT 2014
On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 08:19 -0700, m.a.riosv wrote:
> perhaps only two digits could be a bit short, IMO three can be a more
> balanced option, because it has a good correspondence with public releases.
Yeah, I think I'd be happy with this.
Also, part of the problems comes from the total-unsorted-ness of version
items in the query page. For instance,
* 3.5.1 release is followed by 3.4.6 RC1
* 4.2.00alpha0+Master comes between 188.8.131.52alpha1 and 184.108.40.206beta1 (the
reason why I missed it)
* "3.3 all versions" comes after "220.127.116.11 rc"
* "18.104.22.168alpha0+Master" comes between "22.214.171.124beta1" and "126.96.36.199beta2"
and so on.
Anyway, it appears that one can use a regular expression to filter
versions, which I was previously looking for but didn't realize it was
under the "Custom Search" section. I can just use that to make it fit
More information about the Libreoffice-qa