[Libreoffice-qa] "No activity" warnings - EasyHacks
barta at quipo.it
Tue Oct 28 15:21:47 PDT 2014
On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:23:31 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
>> But that's probably hard to do ATM, so I'd avoid any "retest pings"
>> there; or at least phrase them differently - in the Easy Hacks, the
>> pings shouldn't be about retesting, but more about the review of the
>> Easy Hack itself, because the fact that it was not taken might indicate
>> that it is not an Easy Hack in the first place :-)
> Indeed. For everything else, lets please refrain from adding automated
> to EasyHacks, if possible -- they are supposed to be read by an
> new contributor and too many comments (esp. over 10 comments and
> ones) are quite a demotivating turn-off.
I understand your point and you are both right.
If we do another "ping retest" thing we will keep the easy hacks out of it
More information about the Libreoffice-qa