[Libreoffice-qa] "No activity" warnings - EasyHacks

[Tommy]

On Tue, 28 Oct 2014 22:23:31 +0100, Bjoern Michaelsen  
<bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:18:04PM +0100, Jan Holesovsky wrote:
>> But that's probably hard to do ATM, so I'd avoid any "retest pings"
>> there; or at least phrase them differently - in the Easy Hacks, the
>> pings shouldn't be about retesting, but more about the review of the
>> Easy Hack itself, because the fact that it was not taken might indicate
>> that it is not an Easy Hack in the first place :-)
>
> Indeed. For everything else, lets please refrain from adding automated  
> messages
> to EasyHacks, if possible -- they are supposed to be read by an  
> enthusiastic
> new contributor and too many comments (esp. over 10 comments and  
> automated
> ones) are quite a demotivating turn-off.
>
> Best,
>
> Bjoern


I understand your point and you are both right.
If we do another "ping retest" thing we will keep the easy hacks out of it