[Libreoffice-qa] Bugzila 4.3.x versions cleanup
pedlino at gmail.com
Tue Dec 1 02:59:32 PST 2015
>> If a user is able to tell that a bug was introduced between 4.0.0 and
>> a bibisect in that range should be able to find the problematic
>> What would be the advantage to have the user install 4.0.0 Beta1, Beta2,
>> RC1, etc?
> Bibisect is really only at this point useful for Linux because the
> documentation on OSX and Windows is still below par. That's at least my
> understanding - have you tried to bibisect on other platforms?
No, I never tried bibisect on Windows. But Sophie volunteered to give me a
hand if I decided to try so I assume it is possible.
Again, what would be the advantage to have the user install 4.0.0 Beta1,
Beta2, RC1, etc? Reducing the search range to a 0.0.1 isn't good enough?
Does the full footwork have to be on the QA side?
View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Libreoffice-qa-Bugzila-4-3-x-versions-cleanup-tp4167758p4167899.html
Sent from the QA mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
More information about the Libreoffice-qa