[Libreoffice-qa] Regression hotspots updated
Bjoern Michaelsen
bjoern.michaelsen at canonical.com
Thu Jun 11 16:41:15 PDT 2015
Hi,
I just updated the regression hotspots page:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/RegressionHotspots
Here are some insights of what changed since the last run one year ago
== Top Ten regression modules changes ==
sfx2 is now at position 6, was at 8.
xmloff is now at position 7, was at 6.
cui is now at position 8, was at 11.
sd is now at position 9, was at 10.
editeng is now at position 10, was at 7.
connectivity was at position 9, is now at 12.
== Top Ten regression directories changes ==
sc/source/core/tool is now at position 2, was at 6.
sc/source/filter/xml is now at position 4, was at 2.
sw/source/filter/ww8 is now at position 6, was at 7.
sw/source/core/txtnode is now at position 7, was at 4.
sw/source/core/doc is now at position 9, was at 11.
sc/source/filter/oox was at position 9, is now at 11.
== Top Twenty regression directories per module ==
(ignoring the $module/qa/entries)
numbers after the path are (old) lcov line coverage numbers for these[1].
Calc:
171 sc/source/core/data 66.2% (30172/45581)
73 sc/source/core/tool 51.2% (18017/35218)
59 sc/source/filter/xml 55.6% ( 9545/17165)
58 sc/source/ui/view 30.4% (11770/38769)
33 sc/source/filter/excel 59.9% (17929/29944)
22 sc/source/filter/oox 41.1% ( 6535/14185)
20 sc/source/ui/docshell 46.1% ( 6288/13639)
18 sc/source/ui/unoobj 68.3% (16252/23790)
13 sc/source/ui/app 23.2% ( 1418/ 6112)
12 sc/source/ui/dbgui 0.5% ( 37/ 7314)
Writer:
59 sw/source/core/layout 72.9% (19496/26740)
53 sw/source/filter/ww8 72.2% (27691/38375)
47 sw/source/core/txtnode 70.1% ( 6186/ 8819)
25 sw/source/core/doc 47.0% (12326/26198)
21 sw/source/core/unocore 66.4% (17607/26503)
14 sw/source/core/crsr 39.4% ( 3008/ 7636)
11 sw/uiconfig/swriter/ui ----- ( -/ -)
Base:
17 dbaccess/source/core/api 41.3% ( 4094/ 9923)
Impress:
15 sd/source/ui/view 23.6% ( 4628/19619)
LibreOffice
13 vcl/source/filter/wmf 69.7% ( 3349/ 4802)
Areas in this list with low test coverage might be good candidates for
additional tests as per tdf#66750.
Best,
Bjoern
[1] http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/lcov_reports/master~2014-11-02_22.37.32/
More information about the Libreoffice-qa
mailing list