[Libreoffice-qa] needsDevEval should not be needed for Help easy hacks? Re: [Bug 72038] LOCALHELP: Unclear...
jmadero.dev at gmail.com
Mon May 11 08:13:34 PDT 2015
On 04/30/2015 12:58 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
> For the issue below, it should be sufficient if someone willing to pick
> it up, just has or gathers information on the function, so that he/she
> can write the text?
> Well, and a pointer as where it should be added. But that's basically
> the same for all Help text.
> Now this type of issue is stuck in the needsDevEval sink hole.
> So maybe just a different easyHack category?
Well - I'm not a huge fan of yet another sink hole category. How would
it help the situation if it was still just a signal that there is a need
for a code pointer (even if simple) ?
More information about the Libreoffice-qa