[Libreoffice-qa] needsDevEval should not be needed for Help easy hacks? Re: [Bug 72038] LOCALHELP: Unclear...

Joel Madero jmadero.dev at gmail.com
Tue May 12 13:59:14 PDT 2015

Hey Cor!

On 05/12/2015 01:56 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Hi Joel,
> thanks for answering!
> Joel Madero wrote on 11-05-15 17:13:
>> On 04/30/2015 12:58 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
>>> ..
>>> Now this type of issue is stuck in the needsDevEval sink hole.
>>> So maybe just a different easyHack category?
>> Well - I'm not a huge fan of yet another sink hole category. How would
>> it help the situation if it was still just a signal that there is a need
>> for a code pointer (even if simple) ?
> Ah no, that is not what I meant.
> When there is a simple code pointer (I could do that, time given..) such
> issues can be marked EasyHack Category:Help or somesuch.
> So that devs don't get bothered with it.
> Does that make sense?
Sure - I see no issue (although let's avoid multi-word, camelCase is the
standard). Perhaps easyHackHelp)?

But how about you just start marking them, others will follow your lead :)


More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list