[Libreoffice-qa] Regression Discussion - >40% of Regressions Need Crucial QA Work

[Joel Madero]

I did just a few minutes of digging:

Here are bugs marked as regressions but not with anything regarding
bibisect (bibisectRequest, bibisected, or notBibisectable) (*147 bugs*)

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?keywords=regression&keywords_type=allwords&list_id=573832&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&status_whiteboard=bibisect&status_whiteboard_type=notregexp

bibisectRequests: *138 bugs* (125 of which are tagged as regressions
correctly)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?list_id=573835&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&status_whiteboard=bibisectRequest&status_whiteboard_type=allwordssubstr

We have 668 bugs tagged as regression - that means that over 40% of our
regressions *need additional work by QA*. This is pretty telling info as
far as I'm concerned.

Best,
Joel