[Libreoffice-qa] 41max and 42max bibisect repositories?

[Xisco Fauli]

Hi Bjorn,


El 04/10/16 a les 15:14, Bjoern Michaelsen ha escrit:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:23:05PM +0200, Xisco Fauli wrote:
>> Does anybody know anything about 41max and 42max bibisect repositories
>> mentioned in this video:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLmEfvjVN7s&t=07m39s ?
>> I can't find them anywhere but it would be wonderful to have those too.
> They have been removed on the rationale that someone looking for an bug as old
> as between 4.0 and 4.1 or 4.1 and 4.2 is rather rare and if it happens -- they
> should just download the 43all repo.
Those repos could help to easily identify the problematic commit in 
these bugs: 
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&f1=keywords&f2=keywords&f3=keywords&f4=keywords&f5=keywords&list_id=638789&o1=allwords&o2=nowords&op_sys=All&op_sys=Linux%20%28All%29&query_format=advanced&resolution=---&v1=regression&v2=preBibibect%20notBibisectable%20bisected&version=4.0.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Master&version=4.0.0.0.alpha1&version=4.0.0.0.beta1&version=4.0.0.0.beta2&version=4.0.0.0%20beta1&version=4.0.0.1%20rc&version=4.0.0.2%20rc&version=4.0.0.3%20release&version=4.0.1.1%20rc&version=4.0.1.2%20release&version=4.0.2.1%20rc&version=4.0.2.2%20release&version=4.0.3.1%20rc&version=4.0.3.2%20rc&version=4.0.3.3%20release&version=4.0.4.1%20rc&version=4.0.4.2%20release&version=4.0.5.1%20rc&version=4.0.5.2%20release&version=4.0.6.1%20rc&version=4.0.6.2%20release&version=4.0%20all%20versions&version=4.1.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Master&version=4.1.0.0.alpha1&version=4.1.0.0.beta1&version=4.1.0.0.beta2&version=4.1.0.1%20rc&version=4.1.0.2%20rc&version=4.1.0.3%20rc&version=4.1.0.4%20release&version=4.1.1.1%20rc&version=4.1.1.2%20release&version=4.1.2.1%20rc&version=4.1.2.2%20rc&version=4.1.2.3%20release&version=4.1.3.1%20rc&version=4.1.3.2%20release&version=4.1.4.1%20rc&version=4.1.4.2%20release&version=4.1.5.1%20rc&version=4.1.5.2%20rc&version=4.1.5.3%20release&version=4.1.6.1%20rc&version=4.1.6.2%20release&version=4.1%20all%20versions&version=4.2.0.0.alpha0%2B%20Master&version=4.2.0.0.alpha1&version=4.2.0.0.beta1&version=4.2.0.0.beta2&version=4.2.0.1%20rc&version=4.2.0.2%20rc&version=4.2.0.3%20rc&version=4.2.0.4%20release&version=4.2.1.1%20release&version=4.2.2.1%20release&version=4.2.3.1%20rc&version=4.2.3.2%20rc&version=4.2.3.3%20release&version=4.2.4.1%20rc&version=4.2.4.2%20release&version=4.2.5.1%20rc&version=4.2.5.2%20release&version=4.2.6.1%20rc&version=4.2.6.2%20release&version=4.2.6.3%20release&version=4.2.7.1%20rc&version=4.2.7.2%20release&version=4.2.8.1%20rc&version=4.2.8.2%20release&version=4.2%20all%20versions
>
> FWIW, 43all contains the builds from 41max and 42max (and then some) -- so when
> server admins complained about use of disc space, the latter where deleted as
> the former can do everything they can.
>
I'm afraid that's not right. I've just bibisected tdf#102205 with 43all 
and the regression was introduced in 
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&q=f2321c529adf6d4a455742c30fb75fbe3f7efe02..911186d98f06b43d4563b401244e2cc216b76f33 
which clearly shows it's not a max repo

Regards

-- 
Xisco Faulí
Libreoffice QA Team
IRC: x1sc0