[Libreoffice-qa] 41max and 42max bibisect repositories?

Xisco Fauli xiscofauli at libreoffice.org
Tue Oct 4 14:08:03 UTC 2016

Hi Bjorn,

El 04/10/16 a les 15:14, Bjoern Michaelsen ha escrit:
> Hi,
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 01:23:05PM +0200, Xisco Fauli wrote:
>> Does anybody know anything about 41max and 42max bibisect repositories
>> mentioned in this video:
>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLmEfvjVN7s&t=07m39s ?
>> I can't find them anywhere but it would be wonderful to have those too.
> They have been removed on the rationale that someone looking for an bug as old
> as between 4.0 and 4.1 or 4.1 and 4.2 is rather rare and if it happens -- they
> should just download the 43all repo.
Those repos could help to easily identify the problematic commit in 
these bugs: 
> FWIW, 43all contains the builds from 41max and 42max (and then some) -- so when
> server admins complained about use of disc space, the latter where deleted as
> the former can do everything they can.
I'm afraid that's not right. I've just bibisected tdf#102205 with 43all 
and the regression was introduced in 
which clearly shows it's not a max repo


Xisco FaulĂ­
Libreoffice QA Team
IRC: x1sc0

More information about the Libreoffice-qa mailing list