[Libreoffice-qa] minutes of ESC call ...
xiscofauli at libreoffice.org
Mon Sep 19 10:43:24 UTC 2016
El 15/09/16 a les 17:06, Michael Meeks ha escrit:
> + Keywords - what is their meaning ?
> + NeedsDevEval vs. needAdvise
> + used randomly apparently.
> => prefer needsDevEval
> => replace all needAdvise -> needsDevEval.
> || ||
> || + UNCONFIRMED: 813||
> + up 100 over the last two weeks.
> || + enhancements: 90||
> || + needsUXEval: 52||
> || + needsDevEval at 73||
> || ||
> + needsDevEval - looking at (JanI)
> + if not an easy-hack, and multiple ways to solve a problem.
> + needs a core dev to say: "this problem should be solved in XYZ
> + easy hacks shouldn't contain needsDevEval ? (Xisco)
> + if missing code pointers, set to NEEDINFO
> + ping people to provide pointers on NEEDINFOs (JanI
After the meeting, Jan, Beluga and I had a long conversation in IRC with
regards to needAdvise/needsDevEval keywords and we arrive to the
- needAdvise: Used when help from developers in needed to confirm
an UNCONFIRMED bug. Info:
* Problem 1: Name is confusing.
+ Action: Rename it to 'needsConfirmationAdvise'
* Problem 2: No New or resolved bugs should use it.
+ Action: Clean it up and create a new gardening task.
- needsDevEval: Should be used when a plausible easyhack lacks the
code pointer, the difficulty, the topic or the skill and a developer
needs to provide the information missing.
* Problem 1: It has been used to propose easyhacks over the
+ Action: Update the wiki accordingly:
* Problem 2: Name is confusing.
+ Action: Rename it to 'needsEasyHackValidation'
* Problem 3: The combination of NEEDINFO + easyhack has been
used instead. NEEDINFO should only be used when feedback from the bug
reporters is needed.
+ Action: Change all NEEDINFO + easyhack to
* Problem 4: 476 bugs use the keyword 'needsDevEval' nowadays.
+ Action: Evaluate one by one to see whether they're
actually an easyhack or not. If so, change 'needsDevEval' keyword to
'easyhack' and if possible, add the topic, code pointer, skill and
difficulty. Adding Jan as CC helps too. In case the topic, the code
pointer, the skill or the difficulty couldn't be provided for lack of
knowledge, Jan could help on that as he's monitoring all easyhacks. If
he couldn't, then the 'needsEasyHackValidation' keyword should be used.
NOTE: In order to propose new easyhacks, the same procedure as in
Problem 4 should be followed.
Feel free to ask if you have any question.
Libreoffice QA Team
More information about the Libreoffice-qa