[Libreoffice-qa] Retiring MAB metas
Ilmari Lauhakangas
ilmari.lauhakangas at libreoffice.org
Thu Jan 26 15:56:13 UTC 2023
On 26.1.2023 17.49, Stéphane Guillou wrote:
> Hi all
>
> We currently have 3 metas that use our deprecated, subjective concept of
> "most annoying bugs":
>
> * [META] Windows Installer Most Annoying Bugs -
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41884
> * [META] Report Builder most annoying bugs -
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61723
> * [META] LibreOffice for Android most annoying bugs -
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84726
>
> I'd like to review and retire these ones doing the following:
>
> * Move their dependents to the obvious parent meta (if any: Android
> ones should use the dedicated Android components)
> * Review their importance if needed
> * Close the metas as "invalid"
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> I'd like suggestions on how to deal with closed reports: I want to also
> categorise closed reports properly for better stats, but I don't want to
> be unnecessarily noisy to subscribed contributors, especially for bugs
> that are long gone.
>
> How do we do a mass change as silently as possible? E.g. replacing one
> "blocks" value in many bugs in one go.
The most silent way is that I add you temporarily to the ninja editors.
Then the emails will not be sent. The next best thing is modifying a
meta bug's Depends on field.
Ilmari
More information about the Libreoffice-qa
mailing list