[Libreoffice-ux-advise] Fwd: [PATCH] Bug 39167
gleppert at gmx.de
Fri Aug 5 07:59:29 PDT 2011
I am using this opportunity to introduce myself. My name is Gerald and I
am working at the University of Cologne in Germany in social sciences
and economics. I have been intensively using LibreOffice (since 1995 in
its first incarnation as StarOffice) and I closely followed its
development since that time. After OpenOffice.org had been founded I
started contributing from the perspective of an end user or something
you might call a heavy user. Last year, I was very pleased that the
product even turned "libre" around an active developers and users
community. So far, I contributed to the wiki (user name "Gerald"), filed
and interacted on some dozen of bugs in the LO bugzilla, contributed the
thesis templates in the OO templates repository, contributed to the
German spell check dictionary and filed some enhancement requests in the
Coming to the point of enhancement requests: After LibreOffice's
inception, I started contributing to the fast growing EasyHacks wiki
page. Quite soon it was mentioned that it would be better and that it is
planned to move all easy hacks to the bugzilla. Hence, I subsequently
transferred the easy hacks, which I had entered, from the wiki to
bugzilla. After that, I added some obvious easy hacks directly to bugzilla.
Generally, my experience with enhancement requests in the LO bugzilla
(mine or requests from others) has been that there is currently very
little to no feed back, review, discussion or comments made to
enhancement requests. IMHO this situation is a bit sad and I hope that
this will be changing in the future.
Improvements to hybrid PDF: As mentioned in the bug 39168, the hybrid
PDF feature is one of the killer features in LibreOffice. However, its
implementation has some practical and usability problems out of those
most had been already raised in the OpenOffice.org bugzilla. However,
most of them can be easily improved in terms of usability and handling.
This was my intention of the three enhancement requests made to hybrid
PDFs (bug 39167, bug 39168, bug 39169) and I was glad that Gabor liked
the idea and took the initiative to start working on two of these easy
Defending bug 39168: As described in the bug entry, the current file
ending "pdf" is suboptimal and hybrid PDFs need to be made more visible
to the user. In the current situation, the hybrid PDF feature is much
less useful than it could be and in many cases it is even
counterproductive (i.e. users who try to open 'real' PDF files in
LibreOffice assuming that they are hybrid PDFs.) There is indeed no hint
to the user what file actually is hybrid pdf. By the way, the file
ending ".pap.pdf" is exactly how it is handled in Papyrus
(www.papyrus.de) where the idea of hybrid PDFs was first implemented.
Marking bug 39168 as 'invalid' without adding any criticism or comment
to the bug entry itself is - in my opinion - inappropriate.
Am 05.08.2011 15:28, schrieb Kohei Yoshida:
> On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 14:48 +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
>> 2011/8/4 Astron<heinzlesspam at googlemail.com>:
>>> I am also not too keen on the ".pdf" file extension being changed to
>>> ".odf.pdf"—there will be enough users who still have the "hide known
>>> file extensions" option of Windows on and thus will only see ".odf".
>>> Additionally, two file extensions look awful.
>> The general problem is that everyone can open a bug in bugzilla and
>> mark it as easy hack, then someone comes and fix it, and it turns out
>> in the review phase that the original idea is not so bright. See
>> Do you think that fdo#39168 is invalid? Then we should close it as invalid.
> Yeah, I don't like the fact that someone who is not a known contributor
> comes along and file an EasyHack even without a discussion on the
> developer list. We don't even know the name of gleppert at gmx.de the
> reporter of this EasyHack and several others that I've seen.
> To gleppert at gmx.de, could you introduce yourself on our developer list,
> and tell us some brief discussion on the EasyHacks that you've filed in
> the past? Thanks!
More information about the Libreoffice-ux-advise