[Libreoffice-ux-advise] Sheet local range names in Navigator

[Christoph Noack]

Hi Markus, hi Kohei!

Am Montag, den 04.07.2011, 01:47 +0200 schrieb Markus Mohrhard:
> Hello Christoph,
>         
>         
>         Could you please give me a hint what Excel version you are
>         referring to?
[...]
 
> I'm refering to Excel 2007. I think we separated adding and viewing
> too. For viewing we thought of Insert->Names-Insert and for defining
> Insert->Names->Define.



http://www.java2s.com/Tutorial/Microsoft-Office-Excel-2007/0120__Formula/NameManagerFilterOptions.htm


> I know that the insert dialog is not perfect yet, for example in my
> opinion it misses the information which range is the target of a range
> name, but these are some improvements for the future.
> 
> 
>         [...]
>         >         Is there any description available (non-code) that
>         summarizes
>         >         how our
>         >         new dialog is intended to work? Maybe I just
>         stumbled across
>         >         weird bugs,
>         >         so I don't know what's intended and what not.
>         >
>         > Except for the limited scope, local and global range names
>         should work
>         > the same way. The only minor difference is that local range
>         names have
>         > a higher priority than global range names. All other
>         difference I can
>         > imagine now are bugs or just not yet implemented but I would
>         like to
>         > reach the point where there is no difference any more.
>         
>         
>         
>         > So just add every bug or change you would like to see in
>         this area to
>         > my nice bug
>          https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38565 .
>         > Every notice in a mail gets lost with the time but I will
>         close the
>         > bug only if i think that all issues mentioned are
>         resolved ;)
>         
>         
>         Sure, sure. I'm just unsure whether the dialog itself is the
>         solution ... mmh ... and if it can be easily described in a
>         bug.
>         
>         However, I'd like to spend the rest of the day with the
>         download section
>         - I missed to work on that since quite some time. So sorry for
>         omitting
>         any further thoughts ... but I'll ping you again. Would that
>         be okay?
> 
> That's perfect. I think Kohei will be back tomorrow and he might have
> some ideas about this topic too. 
> 
> Greetings to Stuttgart.
> 
> Regards,
> Markus
> 
> 
> 
> 
>