[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 87538] COLOR PICKER: New default color palette

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87538

--- Comment #5 from Jay Philips <philipz85 at hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #4)
> I'm not opposed to this. But if the color picker at 12 columns but showing
> just 10 rows is a problem, it might be a better option to expand number or
> rows, or even columns shown.

Expanding the number of rows doesnt solve the primary problem with the color
palette, which is that there are two many colors in it. Most users need a small
range of colors to choose from and now that we have the color picker dialog
available in the drop down, those that want to choose an exact color now have
easy access to doing so.

> Q: what would be the best layout of the color picker to accommodate a new
> standard.soc pallet?

I believe the current layout of 12 columns is fine, as all three of the
suggestions fit it.

> 1.) kind of feel like we are obliged to support our LibreOffice branding,
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Marketing/Branding#Color_Table most of
> which are in our standard.soc table now.  Reworking as you suggest probably
> would require that we move this entire branding color chart into its own
> pallet--an addition to your bug 87541 suggestion. Leaving us free to reduce
> and adjust the standard.soc;

We have a libreoffice.soc and i would have assumed it does cover any colors
related to the branding.

> 2.)  Wade Peterson's did some very compelling work for a device neutral
> color pallet, in bug 80196 -- it could/should occupy the lower rows of the
> standard pallet.

Seems interesting and it would be great for Wade to fill in the upper rows so
it could be put into an .soc file so it could be tried.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.