[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 87613] SIDEBAR: Sort slide transitions alphabetically

[bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org]

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87613

V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vstuart.foote at utsa.edu

--- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.foote at utsa.edu> ---
Agree with Cor, alphabetizing probably does not gain much for the UX. And adds
a whole lot of work to implement alpha sort consistently for all l10n/i18n.

Q: Rather than alphabetizing of our labels, would standardizing our listbox
ordering with groupings more closely following the sequence of the SMIL 2.0
transition taxonomy (ref) by type and sub-type (which would of course be
language neutral) provide a more consistent UI? 

On the transition listbox--"No transition" would remain the top item, and place
"Random transition" next. Then follow in listing ordered as groped by the SMIL
2.0 type and sub-type?

-=ref=-
http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/REC-SMIL2-20050107/smil-transitions.html#TransitionEffects-Appendix

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.