[Libreoffice-ux-advise] [Bug 101252] Alphabetical User-Defined index

[bugzilla-daemon at bugs.documentfoundation.org]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101252

Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|needsUXEval                 |easyHack, needsDevEval

--- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze <tietze.heiko at gmail.com> ---
(In reply to lafeuil from comment #7)
> ... I thought it is not very complicated to implement it.

That might be true. But an alphabetical index and an user-defined index that
can be sorted alphabetically adds confusion. In the long term we should come up
with a better/easier solution.

I have to admit that your workflow is still not entirely clear to me. The usual
operation for footnotes is straightforward, so why do you add a ToC there
(shouldn't it be restricted to the current page)?

Anyway, the change is pretty simple and makes sense for the user-defined index,
which has to be as flexible as possible. So I remove the needsUXEval and
suggest to reuse what is there in the alphabetical index. 

Easyhack?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.